More Pages: Mitchell Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


Excellent book, but beware the binding!
A soul in despair...The word "Walpurgisnacht" has its folklore roots in the concept that the night of April 30th is an evil night, one when old values are destroyed and replaced by new ones. But, in the mind of Meyrink no new values will bring salvation to the world. The novel was published in 1917, and the setting is the city of Prague during WWI. The main characters are Zrcadlo (the mirror) the solitary man who forces people to look into their own souls, and Dr. Thaddaeus the only survivor of a spiritual alchemy, the only character capable of facing his sould and taking a new direction in his life.
In his contempt for established religion, Meyrink brings forth the concept of Aweysha. Anyone who is not able to hear his own soul becomes an "aweysha," a living body whose soul has moved into another living being, a dead mirror where strange demons come and go, a wandering corpse. Defying the concept of "free will," Meyrink holds that anything a person does against his will comes from "aweysha."
Myerink was influenced by Jewish mysticism and found in the experience of the "innermost I" the salvation of the soul: "the innermost I is the source of joy, and who does not worhsip it is a servant of hell." Unfortunately, his mystical experience integrates the good and the evil alike, downgrading the soul to low moral standards.
This novel is a reflection of personal despair, a desperate search for a transcendent reality that will surpass mysticism into the esoteric.
Oh comentarios

MIDWEST BOOK REVIEWChance McCord is Sheriff of the town. A handsome man who has loved Shayleen since she was a child and lovingly calls her Irish. Both he and Buck Matthews were befriended by Tom O'Malley years ago. When no one else would give them a chance to work for an honest day's pay, he did. They were eternally grateful to him and they were bonded to the O'Malley family. Tom O'Malley's hopes rest on Chance, he knew that there was a spark between him and his little girl. However, is Chance really the upright citizen that all see him , or does he have a dark, secret past? Brandy would know. And what about Brandy, who is not the lady that Shayleen is, where does she fit in this scenario? She also has her sites set on Chance, and is not going to give up that easily. After all, hasn't she been the one who has been in his arms and felt his passion? Why was someone trying to kill Tom and Shayleen? Is Brandy the one who is behind the shootings? Sorry, you will have to read the book to find out the answer. What are Bucks feelings and will he express them?
What happened that day when Shayleen was thrown from her horse? Why did Shayleen's heart leap at the sight of this stranger, Trace Cooper, who came to her aid. Was it fate that brought him into her life, or is he only going to complicate and confuse her feelings for Chance? Does he too fall in love with this woman? I'll tell you this much, there will be a wedding, but you'll have to read the book tofind out who the lucky groom is.
Come into the world of Shayleen O'Malley and see if you can figure out who her true love is. This one may surprise you. I enjoy books with a happy ending and Autumn Sky fits the bill.
A True Romancemystery, love and passion in this novel.To story opens with Shayleen O'Malley returning home after five years in Pennsylvania. Shereturns home to the land she loves and Chance McCord the man she has loved since she was
eight years old. In a freak accident she meets Trace Cooper a loner, some call a mountain man. When she is forced to run the ranch after her father's accident it's Trace who comes to help.He finds himself captivated by the violet eyed beauty and hoped to change her affection from Chance to him.
Through the entire story one finds themselves wondering which one will win the heart of Shayleen. Will it be the handsome Chance McCord the sheriff whom she has loved and
wanted all her life, or the mountain man who has nothing to offer her but his heart and souland his love .
The story will keep one interested from the first page to the last and wanting to know more.


A Must Read..."Eloquent art speaking straight to the heart"
simple lines, great achievement

Once you get there...
great descriptions of wine growers and hotels in the region

A good book
Buy Your Own Business

I need the exapmles of book. ( Files of listing)
great book

Could have been better
An outstanding contribution to World War II studies.

A personal look at both sides of the Civil WarThis is a book that reaches across the centuries to bring a distant war close to the reader. It should be required reading in every American history classroom.
From those who were there

Out of touch with realityWhat sets Mead's idea of the generalized other apart from that of Habermas' is the idea that such generalized others may be the basis of universal judgments, even if the actual community/universe/generalized other is quite small, whereas Habermas seems to think of "universalism" only in the context of mankind at large -- Habermas' idea of universalism has a quasitranscendental foundation, whereas Mead posits a contextual universalism grounded in the community's inherent reason. In general, Mead the pragmatist has greater faith in the rationality of habits and nonreflective practices than most philosophers seem to have (one is thus reminded of much more conservative thinkers, such as Burke or Oakeshott).
On the other hand, Habermas and Mead seem to agree that it is reasonable to expect to find "truth" in politics, in other words, they think it possible to find some policies better than others from a quasi-objective point of view. They differ in that Habermas seeks truth through rational discussion leading to consensus, whereas Mead appears to have thought such consensus would be reached automatically if only people were educated enough (Rousseau, anyone?). Hannah Arendt dismissed the idea of truth in politics altogether, and very sensibly concluded that politics consists of balancing varying interests and irreconcilable differences. Aboulafia does not recognize this offensively totalitarian strain in Mead's political theory, perhaps he has not heard about the "re-education" programs in countries where only one truth is allowed in politics. In general, I would say that Aboulafia's treatment of Mead's politics is shallow. He mentions Mead's claim that nationalism is founded on insecurity, but leaves it at that, as if such simplistic phrases could even begin to explain an ideology which is a major building-block in every modern state. He further mentions that Mead did not fully trust free markets, "he was, after all, a progressive". Once again, no explanation or elucidation. This is intellectual sloppiness at its worst, the author taking for granted that the foundations of modern society can be dismissed out of hand as longs as his readers share his own perspective. Such failures to take political realities seriously contribute to the image of contemporary philosophy as detached from and disinterested in the real world.
Nor does the lengthy presentation of Levinas' thought do much to improve this image. Not only are the quoted passages from Levinas obscure to the point of being virtually meaningless, the actual theory is so bereft of any understanding of human nature and the times we live in that it is impossible to convey it in a short review. In brief: every self-assertion is a form of violence, and self-denial is the only road to justice. Two of the book's five chapters are dominated by this strange thinker, and the book is all the worse off for it.
All in all, I think the editorial review exaggerates the contribution made by this work.
Oyangen Shmoyangen

A little slow but interesting.
A Canadian Treasure
While the content of this book is excellent, this defect is a serious problem. If you buy the book, plan on gluing the cover in place yourself.
I actually obtained two copies directly from the publisher, Ariadne Press. When the first defective copy arrived, they sent another but said that the books were printed in the UK and they could not guarantee the quality. They also said this problem was possible with all of their Gustav Meyrink titles, though I've only had the problem myself with "Walpurgisnacht" and "The Deadalus/Ariadne Book of Austrian Fantasy: The Meyrink Years 1890-1930."